Direct answer
What is graphiti?
Not verified
Best for
Good fit
- Teams needing time-aware entity relationships and continuously updated memory
- Teams that value temporal graph modeling for changing facts and relationships
- Source-backed technical evaluation before production adoption
Not for
- Small assistants that only need a short conversation summary
- Graph extraction, storage, and retrieval add operational complexity
- Procurement decisions made without a workload-specific pilot
Pricing & decision signals
Pricing notes
The public repository can be evaluated without a software license fee. Hosted services, model usage, infrastructure, support, and enterprise features may add cost; verify current terms with the project or vendor.
- Category
- AI Automation
- Confidence
- High
- Last reviewed
- Jun 30, 2026
- Source type
- GitHub
- License
- Apache-2.0
Pros & cons
Pros
- Temporal graph modeling for changing facts and relationships
- Public repository supports code-level review
- Apache-2.0 license metadata is recorded
Cons
- Graph extraction, storage, and retrieval add operational complexity
- Capabilities and project activity can change after this review
- Production adoption requires explicit evaluation and ownership
Features & use cases
Features
- Temporal graph modeling for changing facts and relationships
- Agentic workflow automation
- Public GitHub repository with 28,144 stars
- Apache-2.0 license metadata available
Use cases
- Teams needing time-aware entity relationships and continuously updated memory
- Automate operations
- Evaluate graphiti as an open-source option before adopting it
- Connect tools
Source & verification
Sources, verification & confidence
Verification notes
- Primary source reviewed: https://github.com/getzep/graphiti
- Primary source reviewed: https://help.getzep.com/graphiti
- Repository license recorded: Apache-2.0
- Repository activity checked: 2026-06-27T17:32:51Z
- Editorial review date: 2026-07-11
- Confidence
- High
- Evidence level
- Source-verified
- Source type
- GitHub
- Last reviewed
- Jun 30, 2026
- Published
- Jun 29, 2026
- Record updated
- Jun 29, 2026
- Repository update
- Aug 17, 2026
From ToolVerse Insights
Agent memory architecture with Claude Mem, Graphiti, and OpenVikingAlternatives & comparisons
Alternatives note
Compare alternatives by workflow role, state control, source quality, operating cost, and the engineering ownership required after a pilot.
Alternative tools
- browser-use
Engineering teams able to sandbox actions and instrument failures
FreeHigh confidence - deer-flow
Technical teams exploring multi-step agents with tools, memory, and subagents
FreeHigh confidence - firecrawl
engineering teams that need a maintained web-data layer instead of custom scraper fleets
FreeHigh confidence
Static comparisons
Not verified
Frequently asked questions
Answers recorded for graphiti.
Not verified